
The ME 163 fuel quantity and rate of climb are incorrect
Dec 26, 2024 · Affects the respective planes: Me 163B-0/1 The Me 163 should have a fuel quantity of 7.5 minutes and rate of climb is 81 m/s , while the current version of the game shows a fuel quantityl of 3 minutes with a rate of climb is 37m/s. This is clearly inconsistent with the current in-game aircraft stats. Sources used are Messerschmitt Me 163B-1a Komet | National Air and …
Me 163 fuel time - Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
Feb 15, 2025 · But the Me 163 B-0 with the 20mm MG 151s definitely can go back down to 8.3 or 8.0 as a tradeoff of having low-calibre cannon firepower with more ammo. It’s also worth noting the Soviet BI rocket plane counterpart at its current state and BR is questionable against the things it faces as well.
3 minutes of fuel in the 163? - War Thunder - Official Forum
Dec 17, 2024 · Dying to Me 163 & Ki-200 in a much faster jet is equivalent to “Erm… I died to A6M2 in my P-51C” in prop tier. Unless the player is already chased by superior planes so that a chasing me 163 catches up to the last resort turn fight. Anyway, the same thing happens in the prop tier though.
Messerschmitt Me 163 B - War Thunder - Official Forum
May 15, 2024 · The 163 is a curious vehicle, while it can be pretty fun its BR leaves allot to be desired, how this thing ever how past 7.3 is a mystery, nowadays with all the unfunny vehicles gaijin added at its br range it cant even catch allot of jets, so i propose its BR be lowered to somewhere around 7.3 so it can face more things like B-29s and the like…which was its …
Me 262 in its proper tier - War Thunder - Official Forum
Jul 11, 2024 · Me. 163B Application of hydrogen peroxide rocket motors by the Walter factory, including for the Me.163, designed in WWII. And as for the fuel flow, they should just give it the ~7:30 it was capable of, or alternatively buff its climbrate which (depending on source, because performance numbers vary a LOT with this plane) is upwards of being ...
Why KI-200, Me 163 B-0, Yak-23, Venom's BR is still located on …
Nov 23, 2023 · there is no historical evidence gun pod of Me 163 b-0 also existed. (I’ve seen a blueprint showing an attempt to install it.) and WT already have non-historical armament like East German MIG-29’s R-27ER and the YAK 141’s IRST seeker, It is a ‘creative armament’ for balance without any problems.
Me 163 B vs B-0 - Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
Jun 26, 2024 · Personally, I’d put the Me-163 at 8.0, and the Ki 200, and the 20mm one at 8.3. However, I am leaning towards moving them even lower due to the compression above 8.0. The biggest issue is that 8.0+ is so compressed. Mig-15s and Sabres should be …
Me 163 with V- tail and parachute - Official Forum
Nov 15, 2024 · And it seems likely that the Me 163 canard was simply a wind tunnel model. However, if the canard were functional, the Me 163’s turning ability would have been much greater than it is now. Honestly, Gaijin is just copy-pasting German premium planes from the regular tree, so I’d rather they release this unique plane as premium or battle pass ...
Why KI-200, Me 163 B-0, Yak-23, Venom's BR is still located on …
Nov 25, 2023 · The only one slightly overtiered is the Me 163 B-0 because nowadays the 20mm ammo isnt as strong as it was and the FM is worse than the Ki200. 8.3 would be fair. Fuel isn’t a problem at all. I flew EC maps in all of 3 without any problems. With 30sec on fuel you can fly through a whole EC map with more than 500kph.
Is there a reason why Me 163 B-0 is heavier than Me163 B ... - War …
Jul 8, 2024 · War Thunder Wiki Me 163 B Catalog Specifications War Thunder Wiki Me 163 B-0 Catalog Specifications According to the War Thunder Wiki, the Me 163 B-0 is 90 kg heavier than the Me 163 B. However, the maximum weight is the same at 4,297 kg. At first, I thought the reason it was 90kg heavier was because of the extra gun pod. But as you can see in this …