Dec 5, 2019 · A recent answer included the following:. For example if you were to start a colony on mars, in this order for supplies and other necessities to be delivered there would need to be a network of space stations or ports midspace so many smaller transport or supply vessels can travel between them and supply the various stations with necessary supply’s coming from earth.

Jul 23, 2020 · Sufficiently many people (a commonly guesstimated figure being a million) living on Mars could eventually be a completely self-sustaining civilisation. Perhaps a sufficiently large space station in orbit around Earth might also be self-sustaining; perhaps such a space station could even provide a refuge from climate change.

Jun 11, 2014 · However, the Mars mission could be done much more slowly, by establishing a small base and slowly expanding it using largely local resources. By comparison, having only succeeded in getting a few small lumps of metal to Mars, we have put a whole space station in orbit. The costs are far lower because the delta-V requirement is lower.

Apr 13, 2017 · Unlike a Mars colony, a colony on Phobos could easily lift off and move to another location, as the gravity is very low. Here is a pdf on missions to the moons of Mars and their role in exploration of Mars. Also a pdf on a phobos space elevator which indicates the kind of neat things a Phobos station might lead to.

Nov 26, 2021 · The bulk of the mission mass is actually needed at Mars (landers, habs etc) Abort options are desirable (parking vehicle at Mars may be helpful) Some/all of the crew intend to stay on Mars; Your business model is making rockets designed to refuel on Mars (SpaceX) Aim is to minimise cost of a bootprint on Mars

Jun 2, 2020 · Just getting to Mars will take longer than a typical ISS mission lasts. The Moon could be used as a literal stepping stone to get to Mars. If we can process raw materials into spaceships and rocket fuel on the Moon, we can build larger, nicer spaceships that require far less energy to reach Mars from the Moon than launching them from Earth.

I know of "Inspiration Mars", a planned 500 days mission to use a Mars free return orbit. Their budget/schedule is very overambitious. MARPOST seems to be the idea to spend total mission time: 730 days, whereof 30 in Mars orbit. What's the value of near-remote controlling robots on Mars surface during 30 days?

Many people would argue that the International Space Station is one of the most extraordinary human accomplishments in space exploration. Considering the short-lived space stations of the pre-ISS era, it really is an astonishing achievement. The thing is, it needed a lot of people to get it off the ground (pun definitely intended). To quote ...

Q&A for spacecraft operators, scientists, engineers, and enthusiasts

Oct 28, 2016 · The resources for a simulated gravity station are better needed on a real mission to Mars to lower real risks of launch, landing and any kind of hardware or software failure. The best place to find out about the effects of reduced gravity is on the Moon and on Mars! We don't need to recreate that which we already have got handy by nature.