Copyright grants intellectual property protection to original works, giving their owners exclusive rights to reproduce, sell, rent and display them.

A new ruling emphasizes that copyright laws protect only human-made art, leaving AI-generated works without any legal ...

The D.C. Circuit affirmed that AI cannot be the sole author on a copyright-registered work, but left questions about the ...

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law. The U.S. Court of ...

I’ve become obsessed with a particular legal, technological, and philosophical question: Can a robot invent on its own?

A computer scientist who tried to register an artwork that credited an artificial intelligence system as the sole author lost his appeal on Tuesday. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals ...

A U.S. federal appeals court today ruled that art created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be ... which denied computer scientist Stephen Thaler a copyright for the image, “A Recent ...

Dr. Stephen Thaler’s attempts to obtain intellectual property protection for artificial intelligence were once again shot down by the courts, when ...

There are likely more questions than answers surrounding the concept of artificial intelligence. It is a new frontier. But the federal appeals court for the D.C. circuit recently answered one ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be ... Office denying computer ...

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed with the U.S. Copyright Office that an image created by Stephen Thaler's AI system "DABUS" was ...

The ruling Tuesday upheld a decision by the U.S. Copyright Office denying computer scientist Stephen Thaler a copyright for the painting "A Recent Entrance to ...